<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cast, pod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/</link>
	<description>Novelist, comics writer, and librarian based in Portland, Oregon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: intothebassment</title>
		<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>intothebassment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscorp.net/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Other YA fiction that you think is good and would like to promote people to read (or listen to).  Good is obviously a very broad word, so it could be whatever you wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other YA fiction that you think is good and would like to promote people to read (or listen to).  Good is obviously a very broad word, so it could be whatever you wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: compound</title>
		<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>compound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscorp.net/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>I second that proposal! No, really.

I would have suggested &lt;i&gt;Me &amp; Edith Head&lt;/i&gt;, but it kinda defeats the purpose, if you can&#039;t see the costumes or dress-making process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that proposal! No, really.</p>
<p>I would have suggested <i>Me &#038; Edith Head</i>, but it kinda defeats the purpose, if you can&#8217;t see the costumes or dress-making process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tugboatcity</title>
		<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>tugboatcity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscorp.net/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>a radio play version of Flytrap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a radio play version of Flytrap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: signifier</title>
		<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>signifier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscorp.net/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>My copy is sadly on the East Coast while I&#039;m on the West, but it&#039;s essentially a very free-form monologue with lots of readings, called &quot;Sixty Minutes More or Less with Madame Psychosis.&quot; Amazon&#039;s search tool reveals that a good Madame-Psychosis-in-the-studio section begins around Pg. 183. &quot;Once last year, Madame Psychosis had the student engineer write out the home-lab process for turning uranium oxide powder into good old fissionable U-235. Then she read it on the air between a Baraka poem and a critique of the Steeler defense&#039;s double-slot secondary. It&#039;s something a bright high-schooler could cook and took less than three minutes to read on-air and didn&#039;t involve one classified procedure or one piece of hardware not gettable from any decent chemical-supply outlet in Boston, but there was no small unpleasantness about it from the M.I.T. administration, which it&#039;s well-known M.I.T. is in bed with Defense. The hot-fuel recipe was the one bit of verbal intercourse the engineer&#039;s had with Madame Psychosis that didn&#039;t involve straight levels and cues.&quot;

Oh, here&#039;s another passage describing the sorts of stuff she reads: &quot;Like for months in the spring semester of Y.D.P.A.H. she referred to her own program as &#039;Madame&#039;s Downer-Lit Hour&#039; and read depressing book after depressing book--&lt;i&gt;Good Morning, Midnight&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Maggie: A Girl of the Streets&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Giovanni&#039;s Room&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Under the Volcano&lt;/i&gt;, plus a truly ghasty Bret Ellis period during Lent--in a monotone, really slowly, night after night...The background music is both predictable and, within that predictability, surprising: it&#039;s periodic. It suggests expansion without really expanding. It leads up to the exact kind of inevitability it denies. It is heavily digital, but with something of a choral bouquet. But unhuman. Mario thinks of the word &lt;i&gt;haunting&lt;/i&gt;, like in &#039;a haunting echo of thus-and-such.&#039;&quot;

(And one thing in particular the name Madame Psychosis evokes is metempsychosis, one of &lt;i&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s many &lt;i&gt;Ulysses&lt;/i&gt; jokes...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My copy is sadly on the East Coast while I&#8217;m on the West, but it&#8217;s essentially a very free-form monologue with lots of readings, called &#8220;Sixty Minutes More or Less with Madame Psychosis.&#8221; Amazon&#8217;s search tool reveals that a good Madame-Psychosis-in-the-studio section begins around Pg. 183. &#8220;Once last year, Madame Psychosis had the student engineer write out the home-lab process for turning uranium oxide powder into good old fissionable U-235. Then she read it on the air between a Baraka poem and a critique of the Steeler defense&#8217;s double-slot secondary. It&#8217;s something a bright high-schooler could cook and took less than three minutes to read on-air and didn&#8217;t involve one classified procedure or one piece of hardware not gettable from any decent chemical-supply outlet in Boston, but there was no small unpleasantness about it from the M.I.T. administration, which it&#8217;s well-known M.I.T. is in bed with Defense. The hot-fuel recipe was the one bit of verbal intercourse the engineer&#8217;s had with Madame Psychosis that didn&#8217;t involve straight levels and cues.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, here&#8217;s another passage describing the sorts of stuff she reads: &#8220;Like for months in the spring semester of Y.D.P.A.H. she referred to her own program as &#8216;Madame&#8217;s Downer-Lit Hour&#8217; and read depressing book after depressing book&#8211;<i>Good Morning, Midnight</i> and <i>Maggie: A Girl of the Streets</i> and <i>Giovanni&#8217;s Room</i> and <i>Under the Volcano</i>, plus a truly ghasty Bret Ellis period during Lent&#8211;in a monotone, really slowly, night after night&#8230;The background music is both predictable and, within that predictability, surprising: it&#8217;s periodic. It suggests expansion without really expanding. It leads up to the exact kind of inevitability it denies. It is heavily digital, but with something of a choral bouquet. But unhuman. Mario thinks of the word <i>haunting</i>, like in &#8216;a haunting echo of thus-and-such.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>(And one thing in particular the name Madame Psychosis evokes is metempsychosis, one of <i>Infinite Jest</i>&#8216;s many <i>Ulysses</i> jokes&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thisisnotanlj</title>
		<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>thisisnotanlj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscorp.net/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>i am intimidated by the enormousness of &lt;i&gt;infinite jest&lt;/i&gt; (yes, i know, totally unjustified coming from a woman who utterly loves &lt;i&gt;jonathan strange and mr. norrell&lt;/i&gt;, moving on...) and thus do not know the reference. explain? expand? the name madame psychosis is certainly evocative...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am intimidated by the enormousness of <i>infinite jest</i> (yes, i know, totally unjustified coming from a woman who utterly loves <i>jonathan strange and mr. norrell</i>, moving on&#8230;) and thus do not know the reference. explain? expand? the name madame psychosis is certainly evocative&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiplet</title>
		<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>kiplet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscorp.net/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>Found art! Randomly dial up some internet content and read it aloud. Theatrical interpretations of spam poetry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found art! Randomly dial up some internet content and read it aloud. Theatrical interpretations of spam poetry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: signifier</title>
		<link>http://sararyan.com/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>signifier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscorp.net/2007/03/cast-pod/#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>I always imagine a podcast that would be something along the lines of Madame Psychosis&#039;s radio show from &lt;i&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always imagine a podcast that would be something along the lines of Madame Psychosis&#8217;s radio show from <i>Infinite Jest</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
